Home                About RVM                  People                      Contact Us  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
   sdfsf
 

 

Quick Links

RVM-West

School of Public Policy

Georgia Tech
NSF
NIH
 

Social Equity and Distributional Impacts

of Science and Technology



 

            A joint project with the Consortium for Science Policy and Outcomes and The Decision Theater of Arizona State University.

 

Case studies

Access to scientific knowledge and technological tools enhances social capital, but such access is highly unequal.  While there is widespread awareness of the inequities in the distribution of S&T benefits, there is no theory about why this occurs and no research documenting the skewness of distributions.

The purpose of the research is to develop useful knowledge about the factors affecting the distributional impacts of S&T.  The focus is on factors internal to science and technology knowledge production processes rather than the social factors that mitigate distributional impacts (e.g., income inequities; lack of universal health care).

There is a great deal of sensitivity in the scientific and technical community regarding blatant abuses of human research subjects, from the Tuskegee Trials to inappropriate testing on vulnerable populations such as children or prisoners. There is also a great deal of research and awareness of the economic inequities in our world that lead to science and technology policy issues such as the “digital divide” or limited access to advanced medical technologies. This study aims to investigate the more subtle ways in which low-income populations may be marginalized from the processes associated with and implementation of science and technology policy.

How do the structural aspects of science and the scientific enterprise marginalize some groups of people? What role, if any, do marginalized individuals (in particular, those who are marginalized due to their economic status) have in defining scientific problems and reaping the benefits of scientific research? Do scientific research agendas and outcomes differentially affect people along the economic spectrum?

 

 

All findings and opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
of the US Department of Energy, the
National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, or the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.