Home                About RVM                  People                      Contact Us  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
   sdfsf
 

 

Quick Links

RVM-West

School of Public Policy

Georgia Tech
NSF
NIH
 

CAREER:  University Determinants of Women’s Academic Career Success


 


 PI: Monica Gaughan

  School of Public Policy

       Georgia Institute of Technology

       monica.gaughan@pubpolicy.gatech.edu

 

                              Funded by: National Science Foundation

Research on Learning and Education

Education and Human Resources Division

 

  • People who are helping with this project

  • Publications (coming soon)

The objective of this 5-year CAREER project is to develop data and methodology to incorporate university factors into the analysis of the academic recruitment, retention, and advancement of female scientists and engineers.  The research team will be comprised of graduate students, undergraduate students, and public school teachers during all phases of the CAREER award.   The team will: 1) develop a longitudinal contextual database of faculty recruitment, retention, and advancement-related personnel practices in Research Extensive Universities; 2) describe and characterize faculty-related personnel practices in this academic sector; 3) link the contextual database to individual-level data; and 4) develop statistical models to test academic career trajectories within and between academic institutions. 

 

1.         Objectives and Significance

The under-representation of women in academic careers, particularly at the most prestigious universities, has been well documented (National Research Council 1979, 1983, 1987, 1991, 1992, 2001; National Science Board 2002). During the past ten years, scholars and policy makers have given increasing attention to the role that universities—as employers and working environments—play in fostering inequitable career outcomes (Dietz et al. 2002; European Commission 2001a; NRC 1991; Rosser and Lane 2002; Sonnert and Holton 1995).  The policy theory driving this work is that women faculty will be more successful in universities that have more gender progressive policies.  However, at the current time, there is no source of systematic and comprehensive data about universities that would allow testing of this general hypothesis, or any of the more specific ones that can be derived from it.  The objective of this CAREER project is to develop data and methodology that will test how university personnel practices and policies affect the recruitment, retention, and advancement of female faculty.  Specifically, the project will enable: 1) the development of a longitudinal database of faculty recruitment, retention, and advancement-related personnel policies and practices in Carnegie Research Extensive Universities (formerly Research I; McCormick 2001); 2) the description and characterization of faculty-related personnel practices in this academic sector; and 3) the linkage of the university database to individual-level data to test multilevel statistical models that will explore how university personnel practices and policies affect academic career success. 

 

1.1       Questions

The CAREER study investigates the following questions:

1.         What are the university policies and practices that affect women’s recruitment, retention, and advancement in academic careers, and how do they vary in their timing, intensity, and function?

2.         Among the Research Extensive universities, what is the range of such policies and practices?

3.         How have these policies and practices varied over time to create changing opportunities for success?

4.         How can the measurement of policies and practices be used to rank universities in terms of their ability to foster women’s success?

5.         In what ways and how do the policies and practices of universities affect the career success of academic faculty, especially women?

6.         Using findings from the study, what are the most effective policies for improving faculty equity in universities? 

1.2       Goals and Objectives

                        Goals

1.         To understand the range and complexity of faculty-related personnel practices at Research Extensive Universities.

2.         To develop models of academic career success that integrate institutional and individual-level predictors.

3.         To improve knowledge about effective faculty-related personnel policies and practices.

4.         To develop new statistical courses and expertise for the students of Georgia Tech, and the profession as a whole.

5.         To integrate undergraduate and graduate students, and K-12 school teachers into the conduct of research.

6.         To contribute to diversity-related service activities at the Institute and beyond.  

7.         To disseminate the substantive and methodological findings to scholarly and policy audiences working in areas related to the scientific and technical workforce.

                        Specific Objectives

1.         To develop a public-use data set that characterizes the faculty-related personnel policies and practices of Carnegie Extensive Universities.

2.         To use (1) to create a limited-access data set that links the institutional characteristics of Universities to the career trajectories of individual scientists.

3.         To use (2) to apply and demonstrate the value of hierarchical statistical techniques to the study of academic career trajectories.

4.         To use the knowledge gained in (3) to develop a graduate-level statistics course for the Institute in longitudinal and hierarchical data analysis.

5.         To use graduate research assistantships, Georgia Industrial Fellowships for Teachers, Research Experience for Undergraduates, and the President’s Undergraduate Research Award to assemble a diverse research group over time.

6.         To participate actively in the School’s Diversity Committee, and the Institute’s NSF Advance project, the Women, Science, and Technology Program, the STEP program, and the Diversity Center Planning Workgroup.

7.         To present and publish these findings widely and often.

 

 

All findings and opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
of the US Department of Energy, the
National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, or the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.